Abstract Peer-review Process/Guidelines


The organizing committee members ensure a rigorous, high-quality, and unbiased peer-review process for all abstracts submitted to the conference. The decision of abstract acceptance will be judged by a panel of expert reviewers and/or session chair and/or conference chairman emphasizing whether the findings and/or conclusions are novel and make useful contributions to the field.

Eligibility for oral presentation will be determined by the total score (with adjustment for differential scoring behavior between referees).

The committee operates a single/double-blind peer review process for all the abstracts submitted, where both the reviewer and the author remain anonymous.

The following are the steps that each abstract undergoes during the process of peer review:
  • All submitted abstracts are reviewed by the internal editorial team to ensure adherence to the conference scope and abstracts which have passed this initial screening are then assigned to the session chair/review committee for evaluation.
  • The session chair/review committee decides whether reviews from appropriate independent experts/reviewers are needed to evaluate the abstract. External reviewer (s) evaluate the majority of the submissions, but it is up to the session chair/review committee to determine the number of reviews required.
  • Once the reviews have been received, the session chair/review committee decides to accept or reject a manuscript, or to request revisions from the author in response to the reviewers’ comments. If the decision is minor revision or major revision, authors will be given 14 days to resubmit the revised abstract.
  • Abstracts submitted by invited and/or keynote speakers will be reviewed by the conference chairman.
Criteria to be Considered for Scoring

The abstract should be reviewed according to the following criteria:

  • The originality of concept/approach and level of innovativeness
  • Significance/impact/relevance to conference theme
  • Quality of research design/theoretical argument
  • Conclusions and interpretations of results
  • Presentation style: coherence and clarity of structure

After the conference, the authors of the selected papers will receive a notification and they have 14 days to submit their full paper to the conference committee. Depending on the topic of the accepted paper (Energy/Technology), the paper will be published in one of the Future Publisher Journals.

Submit Your Abstract

Phone:+1 (323) 366 0555

Address: 309 Crestwood Ln, Russellville, 72802 AR, United States

Contact Us:

Sponsorship& Registration

Name: Sarah White

Email: swhite@gsusi.com

General Inquiry


Email: info@gsusi.com